I think a large portion of my posts begin with some variation of the phrase, “There is a great deal of confusion surrounding aspect xx of reverse mortgages.” While this certainly speaks to a lack of originality in my part, let’s face it, reverse mortgages are complicated. There are a lot of aspects which seem superficially similar to conventional mortgages, but are actually quite different. Reverse mortgage interest is one such aspect.

It’s not the the calculation of reverse mortgage interest which is complicated. Just like any other loan, interest is calculated on the outstanding balance of the loan. Whether you take the proceeds from a reverse mortgage as an upfront payment or in installments, interest charges will be calculated monthly based primarily on the amount of money that has been withdrawn to date. However, since you aren’t expect to make payments (interest or otherwise) to the lender with a reverse mortgage during the life of the loan, the loan balance will actually increase over time, such that you are not only paying interest on the principal, but also on the accrued interest. In this sense, a reverse mortgage can be thought of as a kind of negatively amortizing mortgage.

When it comes to the issue of tax deductibility, things get a little hairy. Unlike a conventional mortgage, the accrued interest associated with a reverse mortgage is not tax-deductible on an annual basis. Thus, while you can write off all (in most cases) of the interest on your conventional mortgage when you file your taxes every April, you can’t include interest on your reverse mortgage.

Instead, reverse mortgage interest can only be deducted when the loan matures. According to the IRS, “Because reverse mortgages are considered loan advances and not income, the amount you receive is not taxable. Any interest (including original issue discount) accrued on a reverse mortgage is not deductible until you actually pay it, which is usually when you pay off the loan in full.” Thus, the IRS feels that since it has been kind enough not to tax you on the proceeds you receive under your reverse mortgage, borrowers then don’t have any grounds for complaint when it comes to not being able to deduct the interest.

If you drill even deeper, however, into the abyss that is the US tax code, you will learn that IRS treats reverse mortgage proceeds as home equity debt, rather than conventional mortgage debt. While this distinction might sound trivial, it actually has serious implications. That’s because the IRS limits the amount of tax-deductible home equity debt to $100,000. Interest on any proceeds that you receive(d) in excess of that threshold, cannot be deducted.

It gets even more complicated when you consider that reverse mortgages are ultimately repaid not by the borrower (assuming he has passed away when the loan “matures”), but by his heirs. This introduces estate tax issues into the equation. Unfortunately, this is beyond my personal expertise, and anyone who ultimately wishes to minimize the tax burden associated with the repayment of a reverse mortgage is encouraged to consult a tax specialist. A financial planner might also be able to make some suggestions about some of the products (insurance and otherwise) which are designed to similar ends.

10 Responses to “Is Reverse Mortgage Interest Tax-Deductible?”

  1. ken solstad Says:

    I’ve found people are surprised by this but cannot figure out why. Seems pretty straight forward. Thanks.

  2. Robert Lally Says:

    It is not straightforward and the IRS published positon may not be technically correct. The Rev. Rul on this is from 1980. IRC 1272 and 163 were cahnged in 1982 to add the OID rules. I see no technical reason why and reverse mortgage is not an OID instrument. as such the intereest accrues. Teh IRS should nopt get it both ways/. Either the nasty OID rules applyu to indidivudals ( which they clearly do) or they do not. The IRS should not get to cherry pick when it likes them.

  3. Erin Kaye Says:

    First of all, if the taxpayer chooses to make payments against the interest on a reverse mortgage, those interest payments would be deductible assuming the other requirements for deductibility are met. A taxpayer aged 62 or over who believes s/he may have difficulty obtaining a regular mortgage might opt to take a reverse mortgage but keep making payments.

    Secondly, IRS publication 936 also states that the amount borrowed under a refinancing representing original acquisition debt is deductible subject to the acquisition debt limit of $1MM, and only the excess is subject to the $100K limit for home equity debt. So if the taxpayer has outstanding acquisition debt at the time the reverse mortgage is taken out, the interest paid on the portion of the reverse mortgage attributable to the payoff of the acquisition debt would be fully deductible and so would interest paid on the excess of the reverse mortgage over the refinanced amount.

  4. Erin Kaye Says:

    Oops, the last sentence above should read “So if the taxpayer has outstanding acquisition debt at the time the reverse mortgage is taken out, the interest paid on the portion of the reverse mortgage attributable to the payoff of the acquisition debt would be fully deductible and so would interest paid on the first $100K of the reverse mortgage in excess of the refinanced amount.”

  5. Mike Says:

    In other words if a reverse loan was used to pay off an existing mortage then the interest on the first $100,000 of the loan paid off would be deductible even when it’s accrued on a reverse mortage.

  6. William Macneill Says:

    What if there is no pre-exisiting debt, aquisition or home equity, on the property when the reverse mortgage is taken. Could that not be characterized in the same fashion as a conventional first mortgage financing in regards to the deductibility of interest (when the loan is repaid at death or when moving from the property)?

    Alternately, it seems to me there must be SOME investment vehicle to enable the productive use of that interest paid (at death or moving away) which exceeds the accrued interest on the first $100,000 of reverse mortgage principal?

  7. CAROL Says:

    OK, I GET IT.. IF I DON’T “ACTUALLY” PAY THE INTEREST UNTIL THE LOAN IS PAID ( OR I DIE ).. I CANNOT CLAIM WHAT I HAVE NOT PAID……….YET.

    ACCORDING TO MY LOAN… IF I “OUT LIVE MY” EQUITY, I AM STILL GUARANTEED A LIFE ESTATE..UNTIL I DIE.. UNLESS I CANNOT REMAIN IN MY HOME DUE TO EXTENDED HEALTH REQUIREMENTS WHERE I NEED TO GO INTO A ASSISTED LIVING HOME. B U T, IF MY STAY IS TEMPORARY… AND I CAN RETURN TO MY HOME IN LESS THAN A YEAR.. THAT STOPS THE CLOCK ON ME HAVING TO SELL THE HOME. IF I GET SICK ENOUGH TO HAVE TO GO INTO A CARE HOME AGAIN.. AS LONG AS I DO NOT STAY THERE CLOSE TO A YEAR, AND I RETURN HOME…. I CAN STOP THE CLOCK AGAIN. MAYBE SOME LOANS ARE DIFFERENT.

    GOOD ARTICLE…
    CAROL

  8. E Banks Says:

    I thought I would get a straight forward answer to a simple question here. I guess I was wrong. I have a reverse mortgage that I have been making monthly payments towards the interest and MIP. The mortgage company tells me I cannot deduct these payments and so they don’t put it on the 1098 form. If I choose to make interest and MIP payments monthly, and it is shown on my monthly statements that it paid toward interest and MIP, why wouldn’t they show it on the 1098?

  9. Al G Says:

    Funny how the IRS will tax interest earned in a savings account, that has not been withdrawn, but will not allow the deduction of interest accrued on a reverse mortgage. The owner of the reverse mortgage if they die, will never get to write-off all that accrued interest, while they’re heirs dance away with his windfall. Doesn’t seem quite fair, does it?

  10. reg woods Says:

    Is home equity debt interest tax deductable?

Have Feedback on This Article?